Archive

Posts Tagged ‘kindle’

Forget Kindle 2: Fujitsu?s E-Reader Screen is Bigger, and It?s in Color

February 12th, 2009 No comments

In all the fuss about the new Amazon Kindle 2 yesterday, it was easy to forget that the “upgraded” device still has a relatively small paperback-sized screen and can only cope with greyscale imagery. And that’s where Fujitsu’s new e-reader triumphs: Its display uses full color e-ink and is way bigger–at least three times bigger, it seems.

Fujitsu’s e-reader is based on “FLEPia” technology from Fujitsu Frontera that incorporates the color screen with a wireless data management system. And that screen is about as large as the average magazine page–making it far more suitable than the Amazon device for browsing magazine-style info or even e-newspapers. That’s certainly why Mainichi Newspapers Co. Ltd. is involved in the trial of the e-papers currently underway in a Tokyo restaurant to see how the public accepts it.

The Termina Kinshicho Fujiya restaurant has a dedicated “BB Mobile Point” wireless LAN installed to serve content to the e-readers–this includes diverse stuff from newspapers to adverts to train timetables and weather reports.

Hardware-wise the e-reader is pretty sleek–it’s got a narrow bezel which makes the Kindle 2’s huge one look positively ugly, and still manages to be a relatively narrow 12mm deep. It also ditches the keyboard of the Kindle since it’s got a touch-sensitive screen. Inside there’s Wi-Fi and USB 2 for connectivity, an SD slot for memory expansion, stereo speakers, and the entire Windows CE5. And the device can go for 50 hours use on a single charge.

There seems to be just a single handicap to Fujitsu’s device, and that is its price. That larger screen, with color e-ink, and the whole slender-packaged design must, of course, make it a more expensive gizmo than the Kindle. But its price is apparently a whopping $900 or thereabouts, versus the Kindle’s $360. And that’s so high it means the e-readers are probably only commercially viable as an asset in restaurants and other establishments like cafes. Perhaps Futjitsu can achieve economies if the trial is successful and the e-paper goes into mass production–but the price would really have to drop for it to work as a consumer product and compete with physical copy newspapers and magazines.

Nevertheless, it looks like the future of e-readers/e-books may be a little closer than we may have supposed–perhaps an all-electronic The New York Times isn’t such a strange proposition after all.

SOURCE

Read the original post:
Forget Kindle 2: Fujitsu?s E-Reader Screen is Bigger, and It?s in Color

Share/Save/Bookmark

Printing The NYT Costs Twice As Much As Sending Every Subscriber A Free Kindle

January 31st, 2009 No comments

|

KindleNYTimes.jpgNot that it’s anything we think the New York Times Company should do, but we thought it was worth pointing out that it costs the Times about twice as much money to print and deliver the newspaper over a year as it would cost to send each of its subscribers a brand new Amazon Kindle instead.

Here’s how we did the math:

According to the Times’s Q308 10-Q, the company spends $63 million per quarter on raw materials and $148 million on wages and benefits. We’ve heard the wages and benefits for just the newsroom are about $200 million per year.

After multiplying the quarterly costs by four and subtracting that $200 million out, a rough estimate for the Times’s delivery costs would be $644 million per year.

The Kindle retails for $359. In a recent open letter, Times spokesperson Catherine Mathis wrote: “We have 830,000 loyal readers who have subscribed to The New York Times for more than two years.” Multiply those numbers together and you get $297 million — a little less than half as much as $644 million.

And here’s the thing: a source with knowledge of the real numbers tells us we’re so low in our estimate of the Times’s printing costs that we’re not even in the ballpark.

Are we trying to say the the New York Times should force all its print subscribers onto the Kindle or else? No. That would kill ad revenues and also, not everyone loves the Kindle.

What we’re trying to say is that as a technology for delivering the news, newsprint isn’t just expensive and inefficient; it’s laughably so.

SOURCE

See original here:
Printing The NYT Costs Twice As Much As Sending Every Subscriber A Free Kindle

Share/Save/Bookmark