Archive

Posts Tagged ‘windows’

Microsoft: Games to be front and center for Windows Phone 7 | ZDNet

September 2nd, 2010 No comments

Microsoft: Games to be front and center for Windows Phone 7 | ZDNet

,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Here is the original post:
Microsoft: Games to be front and center for Windows Phone 7 | ZDNet

Share/Save/Bookmark

Image Gallery: 90 images of Microsoft Windows Phone 7 Technical Preview

July 24th, 2010 No comments


Windows Phone 7 developer phone from Samsung
Microsoft reached a major milestone with development of Windows Phone 7 and has devices loaded with the Technical Preview that will be sent to thousands of developers. We have one of these in hand and it is performing near flawlessly at this time, which is a good sign of things to come from Microsoft as they get back in the game. Windows Phone 7 has a rather unique user interface and is designed to help you work better without focusing on the individual application approach seen on the iPhone. Check out the 8 page article and 6 videos that go with this image gallery, Definitive Guide to the Windows Phone 7 Technical Preview.

Source

Go here to see the original:
Image Gallery: 90 images of Microsoft Windows Phone 7 Technical Preview

Share/Save/Bookmark

Microsoft Launches Outlook Facebook Integration [Exclusive]

July 13th, 2010 No comments

Microsoft is announcing today that it has integrated Facebook (Facebook) and Windows Live Messenger (Windows Live Messenger) into Outlook, bringing the streams of millions of Facebook users into inboxes across the world.

Last year, Microsoft launched Outlook Social Connector, a plugin that syncs social networking feeds with your Outlook contacts, giving you immediate data on what they are doing and thinking. It started last year with LinkedIn (LinkedIn) integration, but soon the company announced MySpace and Facebook were coming.

Today, Outlook completes the cycle with not only Facebook integration, but support for Windows Live Messenger as well. Not only that, but the company is releasing the plugin for Outlook 2003 and 2007 users as well, bringing Facebook, MySpace (MySpace), LinkedIn, and Windows Live Messenger to millions of business and personal inboxes worldwide.

Last week, we got a sneak peek at the new Outlook at Microsoft’s headquarters in Redmond, Washington. Here’s what you can expect from the new Facebook integration, as well some features that you can expect in the near future:


Facebook + Outlook = Realtime Contact Data


Facebook and Microsoft worked together to get the launch of Facebook’s integration in Outlook Social Connector right. Facebook’s Strategic Partner Manager Rick Armbrust told us that they worked closely with the Office team to make the experience more social. One of the things he immediately highlighted was the pulling of Facebook profile pictures into Outlook.

The entire experience is a step above the Outlook-LinkedIn integration, which itself was pretty strong. Not only does it pull Facebook profile photos so that you can associate a name to a face, but it pulls the news feeds of your contacts into your inbox. When you’re looking at someone’s email, you’ll also get a glance at their status updates, picture uploads and wall posts, among other activities.

When you combine that with LinkedIn, MySpace, Windows Live Messenger, and Outlook data, you get a very detailed history of your interaction with your contacts, as well as an at-a-glance look at their activities and interests. Knowing that a potential client just returned from a trip to Hawaii can be all that you need to have the upper hand against your competition.

Microsoft Group Product Manager Paco Contreras told us that there’s another new feature to the Facebook integration: realtime updates. Thanks to a new update to the social connector platform, also being released today, updates from your contacts will automatically be pushed to your inbox. There’s no need to refresh anything: new Facebook status updates will pop up in realtime within Outlook.

The Facebook integration does have limitations, though: except for friend requests, Outlook can only pull data from Facebook. There is no “liking” posts or updating your status via Outlook, at least right now. Microsoft says that the next step is to provide a richer social experience by integrating the ability to push data to other social networks, improving the look and feel of Outlook Social Connector, and adding other social networks from other regions.


The Social Inbox


Microsoft has known for a while that social technologies are going to dominate the web. That was made evident by its $240 million stake in Facebook and its many partnerships and attempts at social media (some of which have bombed).

However, Outlook Social Connector has always felt like one of the company’s smarter social media plays. Facebook’s Rich Armbrust probably put it best:

“What’s unique is that it’s bringing social elements and context from Facebook form your colleagues and your friends into the Outlook experience, which is pretty unique given that there are so many that use Outlook as their primary communiction tool.”

Email isn’t inherently a “social” experience (it’s not a one-to-many platform), and attempts at integrating social into the inbox (think Google Buzz) have mostly fallen flat. However, social data can be incredibly useful in the business world, especially when you need to understand what your client or colleague is thinking or doing right now. While we’d still love to see Twitter (Twitter) integration in Outlook, Facebook is far larger and, in most cases, has far more useful information.

Microsoft’s also learned a few lessons from the privacy fiascos Facebook and Google (Google) have undergone in recent months. Outlook will only pull data from emails connected to Facebook accounts. If your business email isn’t linked to your Facebook, your data stream won’t appear in Outlook Social Connector. It gives users a choice, although most people do choose to add their work emails to Facebook in order to join their company’s Facebook network.

If you want to learn more about the announcement, Microsoft has also released a short video articulating Outlook’s new features:


Facebook Outlook Social Connector Announcement Video


, ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Read the original here:
Microsoft Launches Outlook Facebook Integration [Exclusive]

Share/Save/Bookmark

Windows 7-based HP Slate referenced at WPC 2010, Ballmer says ‘hardcore’ tablet push coming

July 13th, 2010 No comments

Is this the answer to the question we posed back in mid-June? Maybe. While we’re still unsure if Hewlett-Packard has a webOS-based tablet in its pipeline, those on-again / off-again Windows 7 rumors may finally be nearing an end. On the homepage of this year’s Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference — which kicks off in earnest today in Washington, D.C. — there’s a pane of Windows 7 slates that are on deck for this year. Er, a pane with vendors promising Win7 slates this year. Sure enough, HP’s logo is front and center, right alongside the likes of Sony, Dell, ASUS, Panasonic, Onkyo, Toshiba, MSI, Samsung, Lenovo and Fujitsu. We’ll be keeping an ear to the ground for more, but for now, feel free to let your imaginations run wild. It’s Monday, after all.

Update: During the event’s opening keynote, which was headed by none other than Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, the bigwig confirmed some of what’s pictured above: Windows 7 slates will be arriving this year. Interestingly, he never mentioned HP by name (despite teasing us gently at CES with an apparent mystery device), but he did note that devices would be available at various price points and in a variety of form factors — “with keyboards, touch only, dockable, able to handle digital ink, etc.” We already knew as much from being overwhelmed by prototypes at Computex, but it’s good to get the word straight from Ballmer himself. Now, to see if anyone’s actually interested in buying a desktop OS on a mobile form factor…

Update 2: Seems Ballmer’s drinking his own Kool-Aid in a serious way, and not just on the tablet front. He noted that Microsoft will be giving consumers “a set of Windows-based devices that people will be proud to carry at home and will fit the kinds of scenarios enterprise IT’s trying to make happen with the phone form factor,” and that Microsoft would be “working vigorously” to “drive enterprise IT and consumers.” Furthermore, Steve affirmed that the tablet sector is “terribly important” for his company, and that it’s “hardcore about this.” He didn’t shy away from calling the range of Windows 7-based tablets coming out “over the next several months” ones that would be “quite impressive,” but honestly — what else would you expect him to say?

from here

, ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Here is the original:
Share/Save/Bookmark

ComScore: iPhone overtakes Windows Mobile use for the first time in US

December 26th, 2009 No comments

ComScore: iPhone overtakes Windows Mobile use for the first time in US — Engadget

Read the original here:
ComScore: iPhone overtakes Windows Mobile use for the first time in US

Share/Save/Bookmark

Marketplace is live on Windows Mobile 6.5 phones

October 8th, 2009 No comments

Marketplace is live on Windows Mobile 6.5 phones

Marketplace is live on Windows Mobile 6.5 phones

Share/Save/Bookmark

Shh!!! HP sneaks Linux in on new laptops

September 17th, 2009 No comments

Shh!!! HP sneaks Linux in on new laptops – Computerworld Blogs

Except for Dell, the major PC vendors are reluctant to admit they actually sell and support Linux. For instance, HP supports Linux quite well on its servers but is very reluctant to support it on its desktops. They have trouble even admitting that they’re now shipping DeviceVM’s instant-on Splashtop Linux on their new notebook lines.

HP had started quietly shipping Splashtop on its new business laptop, the HP ProBook 5310m. Curiously, HP is continuing to ship its Windows/Outlook-based QuickLook on the ProBook as well. Why would you bother with that, since Splashtop could support the full-featured Evolution e-mail client? You can also use Gmail or any other Web-based mail system with QuickWeb. Perhaps HP wants to stay on Microsoft good side. After all, that also would explain why HP has been so hesitant to make it easy for would-be buyers to get Novell’s SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop) 11 on HP desktops.

more >>

Nonetheless, QuickWeb is also going to be available on HP’s high-end consumer notebooks: the MacBook-like ENVY 13 and the ENVY 15, and the not-yet-shipping Windows 7 HP Mini 110 netbook model.

Buyers who want the Mini 110 should make sure they’re buying exactly what they want with this model. HP currently sells a version of the Mini 110 with Ubuntu Linux, which I recommend, and another version with XP. The 5310m, which isn’t available yet, will come with Windows 7 Starter Edition. While Windows 7 Starter Edition is no longer crippled by a three-application limit, it’s still easily the weakest member of the Windows 7 family.

QuickWeb is really just a subset of Splashtop. While HP could have offered a full Splashtop Linux desktop, they’ve elected to only offer the Web interface. Still, it’s a good Web browser. Not only does it boot up in 20 seconds or less, it can view and play multimedia files in such common formats as Adobe Flash, Adobe PDF documents, and MP3 music files.

While HP isn’t going to let you get the full Splashtop Linux experience, the Web version is quite impressive. I can see many users never actually using their laptops’ installed operating system. After all, with just some Linux and most of the Web, what else do you need?

See more here:
Shh!!! HP sneaks Linux in on new laptops

Share/Save/Bookmark

Windows Mobile 7 to natively feature Social Networks integration

September 17th, 2009 No comments

Windows Mobile 7 to natively feature Social Networks integration « MobileTechWorld

Windows Mobile 7 to natively feature Social Networks integration

windowsmobile7

See the original post here:
Windows Mobile 7 to natively feature Social Networks integration

Share/Save/Bookmark

Apple’s Snow Leopard puts the industry to shame

August 30th, 2009 No comments

Apple’s Snow Leopard puts the industry to shame – InternetNews:The Blog – Christopher Saunders

Apple OS X Snow Leopard
Source: Apple

News and analysis of Apple’s new release of OS X — version 10.6, dubbed “Snow Leopard” — have already begun making the rounds this week. With the update going on sale today, you’re certain to have seen plenty of reports assessing whether it’s worth it, whether it’s a must-have update, whether it’s an “important” milestone for the Apple Mac operating system.

But what precious few news outlets have spent much time pondering is that the new OS is smaller and faster than before.

Take a second to think about this.

With each subsequent release of OS X, the operating system’s performance has gotten better and better while hardware requirements have barely moved. Actually, until Snow Leopard’s debut, you could continue running the latest version of the operating system on hardware that existed even before OS X itself and still be realizing performance improvements.

And today, users may notice that with Snow Leopard, the operating system’s footprint on their hard drive has also begun decreasing. That’s right: OS X 10.6 takes up less space than 10.5 — while being faster and introducing new features.

Oh, yeah: Snow Leopard retails for $29.

Now Apple’s just showing off.

But the company’s superior approach to the OS can’t be denied. We have another example of how Apple’s is unique in the realm of mainstream consumer operating systems: OS X gets faster and more powerful each time without significantly upping its hardware requirements.

In the age of Windows Vista, this seems incredible.

But it’s not. It’s just great software engineering. The dominance of Windows has gotten us accustomed to thinking very differently about how an OS should perform, and how much it should ask of its user. In fact, the entire industry now counts on users to upgrade their systems to be able to handle the newest operating system.

Many of the fortunes of the largest companies in the space are now tied to the Windows release cycle, with everyone from Intel to Dell awaiting the launch of Windows 7 in October.

It’s a different matter for Mac users, since Apple’s approach to OS X has some potent implications for what drives new Mac purchases.

Viewed through the prism of Windows, it might seem baffling that new Mac purchases aren’t tied to the release of a new OS. Instead, Mac users find other reasons to buy, with at least one reason being because Apple’s already peerless hardware design improves in each iteration. Maybe they want to run the latest version of Photoshop. Whatever the reason, Mac users only upgrade because they want to — not because the operating system’s growing heft makes it a necessity.

No wonder these are some of the most loyal customers in any industry.

Not everyone missed out on noting Apple’s continued successes in whittling down OS X’s footprint while speeding it up: Our own Sean Michael Kerner touched on the subject in his recent piece on Snow Leopard; as did New York Times tech columnist David Pogue in his review of the new OS. Brian Caulfield at Forbes.com devoted an entire column to it.

And rightly so — feats like this, I believe, need to be highlighted.

This is the way that system software should be architected. Each successive release of OS X has gotten lighter and more efficient. It hasn’t introduced bloat that forces users to upgrade their systems. Quite the opposite: It’s gotten leaner while getting more powerful.

It’s not clear that Microsoft will ever feel compelled to work the same way. It’s got too much riding on it now that the entire PC ecosystem seems to be counting on Windows 7 to drive new a new crop of PC sales.

That’s a pity for the consumer, who shouldn’t be required to shell out for new hardware just to run the newest system software. It’s all the more troubling when the new system software is released chiefly to fix problems with previous system software (think back to Vista’s marketing as being a more secure replacement for Windows XP; now consider Windows 7’s positioning as a faster, less cumbersome Vista. See a pattern here?)

Microsoft’s clearly not the only major software developer wrestling with these issues. (I mentioned Adobe a moment ago: Photoshop’s a wonderful application, true, but with each upgrade it also generally manages to re-establish itself as a system-dominating resource hog.)

Among the top software developers, who else has a reputation for successive, major releases that work better and run faster without raising platform requirements?

Think about this and let me know. I bet you’ll find it’s a pretty short list.

Apple OS X Snow Leopard
Source: Apple

News and analysis of Apple’s new release of OS X — version 10.6, dubbed “Snow Leopard” — have already begun making the rounds this week. With the update going on sale today, you’re certain to have seen plenty of reports assessing whether it’s worth it, whether it’s a must-have update, whether it’s an “important” milestone for the Apple Mac operating system.

But what precious few news outlets have spent much time pondering is that the new OS is smaller and faster than before.

Take a second to think about this.

With each subsequent release of OS X, the operating system’s performance has gotten better and better while hardware requirements have barely moved. Actually, until Snow Leopard’s debut, you could continue running the latest version of the operating system on hardware that existed even before OS X itself and still be realizing performance improvements.

And today, users may notice that with Snow Leopard, the operating system’s footprint on their hard drive has also begun decreasing. That’s right: OS X 10.6 takes up less space than 10.5 — while being faster and introducing new features.

Oh, yeah: Snow Leopard retails for $29.

Now Apple’s just showing off.

But the company’s superior approach to the OS can’t be denied. We have another example of how Apple’s is unique in the realm of mainstream consumer operating systems: OS X gets faster and more powerful each time without significantly upping its hardware requirements.

In the age of Windows Vista, this seems incredible.

But it’s not. It’s just great software engineering. The dominance of Windows has gotten us accustomed to thinking very differently about how an OS should perform, and how much it should ask of its user. In fact, the entire industry now counts on users to upgrade their systems to be able to handle the newest operating system.

Many of the fortunes of the largest companies in the space are now tied to the Windows release cycle, with everyone from Intel to Dell awaiting the launch of Windows 7 in October.

It’s a different matter for Mac users, since Apple’s approach to OS X has some potent implications for what drives new Mac purchases.

Viewed through the prism of Windows, it might seem baffling that new Mac purchases aren’t tied to the release of a new OS. Instead, Mac users find other reasons to buy, with at least one reason being because Apple’s already peerless hardware design improves in each iteration. Maybe they want to run the latest version of Photoshop. Whatever the reason, Mac users only upgrade because they want to — not because the operating system’s growing heft makes it a necessity.

No wonder these are some of the most loyal customers in any industry.

Not everyone missed out on noting Apple’s continued successes in whittling down OS X’s footprint while speeding it up: Our own Sean Michael Kerner touched on the subject in his recent piece on Snow Leopard; as did New York Times tech columnist David Pogue in his review of the new OS. Brian Caulfield at Forbes.com devoted an entire column to it.

And rightly so — feats like this, I believe, need to be highlighted.

This is the way that system software should be architected. Each successive release of OS X has gotten lighter and more efficient. It hasn’t introduced bloat that forces users to upgrade their systems. Quite the opposite: It’s gotten leaner while getting more powerful.

It’s not clear that Microsoft will ever feel compelled to work the same way. It’s got too much riding on it now that the entire PC ecosystem seems to be counting on Windows 7 to drive new a new crop of PC sales.

That’s a pity for the consumer, who shouldn’t be required to shell out for new hardware just to run the newest system software. It’s all the more troubling when the new system software is released chiefly to fix problems with previous system software (think back to Vista’s marketing as being a more secure replacement for Windows XP; now consider Windows 7’s positioning as a faster, less cumbersome Vista. See a pattern here?)

Microsoft’s clearly not the only major software developer wrestling with these issues. (I mentioned Adobe a moment ago: Photoshop’s a wonderful application, true, but with each upgrade it also generally manages to re-establish itself as a system-dominating resource hog.)

Among the top software developers, who else has a reputation for successive, major releases that work better and run faster without raising platform requirements?

Think about this and let me know. I bet you’ll find it’s a pretty short list. source >>

Credit:
Share/Save/Bookmark

Parallels releases Switch to Mac bundle

August 25th, 2009 No comments

Parallels releases Switch to Mac bundle | Business Center | Macworld


Striving to provide an all-in-one-retail-box solution to Windows users who want to switch to the Mac, Parallels announced Tuesday that it’s releasing a new version of its Parallels Desktop software that comes with a USB transfer cable and in-depth interactive tutorials to ease in the Windows-to-Mac transition. more >>

Continued here:
Parallels releases Switch to Mac bundle

Share/Save/Bookmark

Windows 7: Tested in depth

August 7th, 2009 No comments

Windows 7: Tested in depth – Crave at CNET UK

Deserved or not, Microsoft had dug itself a cold, deep, dark hole with Windows Vista. Users demanding that Redmond extend the life of Windows XP wasn’t exactly something they could be proud of, either. Bombarded by complaints and negative press even after the first service pack was released, the bar had been set high for Vista’s successor: Windows 7.

Luckily for Microsoft, Windows 7 is more than just spin. It’s stable, smooth and highly polished, introducing new graphical features, a new taskbar that can compete handily with the Mac OS X dock, and device management and security enhancements that make it both easier to use and safer. Importantly, it won’t require the hardware upgrades that Vista demanded, partially because the hardware has caught up, and partially because Microsoft has gone to great lengths to make Windows 7 accessible to as many people as possible.

It’s important to note that the public testing process for Windows 7 involved one limited-availability beta and one release candidate, and constituted what some have called the largest shareware trial period ever. As buggy and irritating as Vista was, Windows 7 isn’t. Instead, it’s the successor to Windows XP that Microsoft wishes Vista had been, and finally places it on competitive footing with other major operating systems such as OS X and Linux.

Microsoft is offering six versions of Windows 7: Starter, Home Premium, Professional, Ultimate, OEM and Enterprise. The three versions that Redmond will be promoting most heavily are Home Premium, Professional and Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor, although Starter will also be available to consumers.

Windows 7 will support both 32-bit and 64-bit systems. The bare minimum requirements for the 32-bit include a 1GHz processor, 1GB of RAM, 16GB of available hard-disk space and a DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver. 64-bit systems will require at least a 1GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 20GB of free space on your hard drive and a DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver. A touchscreen monitor is required to take advantage of the native touch features. Do note that some users have claimed to have limited success running the Windows 7 beta with less than 1GB of RAM, but that’s not recommended.
Installation

Microsoft is offering several paths to install Windows 7. People can buy a new computer with the operating system already installed, upgrade from Windows XP or Vista, or do a clean install on a computer the user already owns. The clean installation took us about 30 minutes, but that will vary depending on your computer.

The upgrade procedure is different depending on whether you’re running Windows XP or Windows Vista. Vista users merely need to back up their data before choosing the Upgrade option from the install disc. Both XP Home and XP Pro users will have to back up their data, then choose Custom from the install disc. Custom will have the same effect as a clean install, although it’ll save your old data in a folder called Windows.old. Once you choose Custom, you’ll need to select the partition of your hard drive that contains Windows XP, and then follow the instructions to enter your product key and allow the computer to reboot as needed.

If you’re not sure if your current computer can run Windows 7, you can download and run the Microsoft Security Essentials from Microsoft.

source >>

Read more:
Windows 7: Tested in depth

Share/Save/Bookmark

Communicator Mobile Just Got Better

August 4th, 2009 No comments

Office Communicator Team Blog : Communicator Mobile Just Got Better

Following the release of Microsoft Office Communicator Mobile 2007 R2 in January, the Communicator team continued to work on additional features and improved upon some of the existing ones. Everything is now in an update that’s ready to use.

One of our goals with this update was to make it easier to join conferences while on the go. Instead of using conference dial-ins and entry codes, you can now join conferences with the single click of a button. This capability is available for all meetings scheduled using the new UC Conferencing capability in Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007 R2. As you can see in the screenshot below, the process is quick and simple. When you open a UC conference invitation in Outlook Mobile, you will see a “Join Conference” option. Clicking on this option will automatically connect conference participants to the call as authenticated users.

Still subject to roaming charges? We have added an option to help you avoid them. When you are outside of your provider’s network, Communicator will not log in to a roaming network. As soon as you are back in your provider’s network, Communicator will log in automatically for you. All you have to do is select the option and Communicator will take care of the rest.


We’ve also done some work to get Communicator Mobile ready for the Windows Mobile 6.5 release this fall. A new plug-in will integrate nicely with the Home screen. In addition to looking good, it will show your presence status and the number of ongoing conversations.

Another benefit of Windows Mobile 6.5 is that it gives you the capability to make a call via work (the ability to place outbound calls using your work identity) directly from your phone dialer. With this enhancement users can dial extension numbers to call their colleagues.

The team also improved the overall experience of making calls via work. In the previous release, you made your call via work and then answered the incoming call to complete the connection. Now Communicator Mobile completes the connection for you by automatically accepting the incoming call.

How to get it

The Office Communicator Mobile 2007 R2 update is accessible via your mobile phone at www.GetCoMo.com or on the Microsoft Download Web site.

from here by Marc Boyer

Read the original post:
Communicator Mobile Just Got Better

Share/Save/Bookmark

Why 2010 Will Be the Year of the Tablet

August 4th, 2009 No comments

Why 2010 Will Be the Year of the Tablet | Gadget Lab | Wired.com

tablet_3

After years of enticing rumors, ambitious prognostications and flat-out blather, 2010 may finally be the year that the tablet PC evolves from being a niche device to becoming a mainstream portable computer.

The tipping point comes via word to Wired.com from a well-connected industry executive that mainstream heavyweights Dell and Intel are collaborating on a touchscreen tablet due for release next year. Though our source has learned little about specifications of the device, what’s apparent is that the tablet will serve as a subscription-based e-reader for displaying newspapers, magazines and other media, giving Amazon’s Kindle — particularly, the nearly $500 large-format DX model — a run for its money.

As notable as the format is the business model: The tablet will be free for consumers who opt into a contract subscribing to one or more digital media subscriptions, according to our source. That’s similar to how telecom companies currently subsidize cellphones when customers agree to two-year contracts.

Our source, who requested to remain anonymous due to a non-disclosure agreement, said the companies are aiming to launch this product in about six months.

Dell and Intel are just the latest examples of a growing trend. MKM Partners analyst Tero Kuittinen said he, too, has heard rumors about not just Dell, but also handset makers Nokia and HTC delivering tablets by end of first quarter 2010. Nearly everyone has now confidently reported that Apple is launching a tablet by early next year. Singapore start-up Fusion Garage and TechCrunch are rushing to release the CrunchPad touchscreen tablet by this November.

Market research firm Display Search now projects the touchscreen market will triple in the next few years, from $3.6 billion to $9 billion.

“The iPhone was a big catalyst for the whole touchscreen industry, even if it’s just from a 3.5-inch mobile phone,” said Jennifer Halgrove, an analyst and director of display technologies with Display Search. “It encouraged people’s imaginations, and now companies are saying, ‘Oh, I can make a bigger one, and I can also have this user friendly interface.’ That really opened this industry.”

The idea of the tablet computer is nothing new to the tech industry. The development of tablet PCs can be traced as far back as 1888, when the United States Patent office granted a patent to electrical engineer Elisha Gray for an electrical-stylus device for capturing handwriting. In more recent years, plenty of hardware companies, such as Hewlett-Packard and Acer, have presented tablets that have only succeeded to fulfill a niche. Controlled with a stylus on a touch-sensitive “digitizer” screen, tablet PCs have traditionally been tailored toward artists and designers, failing to break into the mainstream.

But in recent years, costs of touchscreen components and software have been declining, and new types of touchscreens are emerging in the display market, Colegrove said. After stylus-controlled digitizer touchscreens came resistive touchscreens, which were very cheap to produce but suffered from low durability and poor transmittance. Then, a newer technology called capacitive touch became available, in which electrodes sense a user’s fingers on the X and Y axes, negating the need for a stylus.

In 2007, Apple featured capacitive touch technology (which it marketed with the more friendly term “multitouch”) in its iPhone and iPod Touch, which have sold 40 million units worldwide to date. Clearly, there is a mainstream audience for these keyboard-less computers, and Apple opened the doors with a superior user interface.

“The touch-based user interface is something we got from the handset market,” Kuittinen said. “And now that you have this innovation, it’s easier to go back to the tablet concept, and say, ‘Wait a minute, let’s add this.’ All of a sudden the device is a lot more appealing and sexier, especially since you have multitouch.”

A $0.00, media-centric tablet from Dell and Intel would certainly be competitive against Amazon’s Kindle in terms of price. Who would buy an Amazon Kindle reader if a free tablet were made available? The Kindle 2 costs $300, and the large-format Kindle DX runs for $490 — and even after purchasing a Kindle, consumers must still pay for content.

At Amazon’s Kindle DX launch event in May, The New York Times teased the idea of subsidizing longer term subscription commitments, but only in areas where “home delivery is not available.” Still, no such subsidy model has yet come into fruition for Amazon’s Kindles.

The idea of opting into a contract might initially sound like a turn-off, but Kuittinen told Wired.com that for cellphones, carrier-subsidy has been an extremely successful method to reel in customers. He said he would expect similar results with a subsidized tablet.

Kuittinen added that he has heard the Dell tablet would measure 5 inches — slightly larger than an iPhone but smaller than a Kindle. However, he said he is skeptical about Intel’s involvement with the product. Given the nature of the company, Intel would provide the guts of the device — perhaps a low-powered processor such as the Atom, which is currently used in netbooks. Kuittinen said this processor is not adequately energy-efficient to power a tablet PC compared to the ARM-based chips used in iPhones and devices running Google Android.

“There’s really no other viable alternative,” he said. “Android has such a strong moment right now. It’s going to be so much easier to develop for it.”

The low cost of Intel’s Atom chips would help keep the a rumored device’s overall price down in order to make subsidy not too hefty for content providers involved. But the software would be the key ingredient to drive the success for this device, and an Intel-based machine would either have to run a Windows or Linux-based operating system.

A tablet produced by Dell and Intel would most likely run a mobile version of Windows 7. In presentations marketing Windows 7, Microsoft has been heavily promoting the upcoming operating system’s support for multitouch. Windows 7 is slated for an October 2009 release.

The challenge for Dell and Intel is unlikely to be the creation of the product, but rather cementing negotiations with content partners. The companies will find it difficult convincing large newspaper companies to convert from being an advertisement-based business to a fee-based business. However, they might be more open to the idea if Dell and Intel keep their tablet at a low cost.

Intel and Dell declined to comment on this story.

source >>

Excerpted from:
Why 2010 Will Be the Year of the Tablet

Share/Save/Bookmark

Inside the Microsoft Store With Wall-Sized Screens and the Answers Bar

July 25th, 2009 No comments

Leak: Inside the Microsoft Store With Wall-Sized Screens and the Answers Bar

We’ve been wondering what the Microsoft’s retail shops are going to be like. Well, according to a Powerpoint presentation leaked to us, it’s going to make the Apple Store look downright boring. UPDATE: Microsoft comments.

The presentation is by Lippicott, a “design and brand strategy” consultant firm with extensive retail experience that it appears Microsoft has hired to help develop the store’s concept, principles, and design. It looks pretty legit to us–if it’s a fake, it’s fairly elaborate, with detailed graphics, research, plans and even rough store layouts.

Essentially, Microsoft is taking the best elements from the Apple Store, Sony Style and other “flagship” stores. The main focuses are going to be Windows 7, Xbox, PCTV (Windows Media Center) Surface and Windows Mobile, revolving around this concept customer they call “Emily,” who’s basically a younger version of your mom, since they make all the buying decisions.

Frank Shaw w/ Waggener Edstrom, left a comment below on behalf of Microsoft, implying that many of these concepts are merely that and not final plans:

As a part of our process in briefing creative agencies, we shared some early prototypes and concepts of our retail store plans. No final decisions have been made. As we previously announced, we are on track to open retail stores this Fall.

Here are the highlights of the slides:

• There’s going to be a Digital Media Wall–a massive screen–that wraps around the entire store, which you can see in some of the slides
• Lots of Surface demos
• Stage areas for Windows 7, Windows Media Center (PCTV), Windows Mobile and netbooks
• Their take on the Genius Bar is the Answers Bar (or Guru Bar, depending on which slide you look at, showing it’s slightly up in the air, though we prefer Answers Bar since its sounds like slightly less of a Genius Bar ripoff)
• They’re already planning out huge demos and events around Project Natal and their secret mobile project Pink
• A fancy Microsoft shopping bag
• You can pay to have your birthday party at the Microsoft Store
Click to view image Click to view image Click to view image

Share/Save/Bookmark

Microsoft to charge Europeans double for Windows 7

June 30th, 2009 No comments

Microsoft to charge Europeans double for Windows 7

Microsoft to charge Europeans double for Windows 7
Prices new OS at 41% to 100% more than in the U.S., but leaves out browser

Microsoft to charge Europeans double for Windows 7

Share/Save/Bookmark